Categories
Computers & Software Services Technology U.K

Ava Tech Now Officially Offers Procurement Services

Leading IT support and systems company, Ava Tech, has officially launched two new services—IT procurement and IT hardware procurement. 

The business started out as a cloud hosting service provider, but over the years, it has started helping its clients with their hardware and software needs as well. 

Since procurement is now a large part of its operations, the business has decided to officially add these to the list of services it offers.

For any modern organisation, the right IT tools are essential for success. Some technology products can improve interdepartmental communication whilst others can enable work efficiency.

Certain operations might even require niche products, such as those that fulfil specific requirements that no other solution can provide.

The lack of proper IT infrastructure, or the wrong one, can affect the smooth running of a business.

Unfortunately, not everyone is aware of the variety of solutions available, much less which ones are optimal for their business.

This is where Ava Tech promises to help.

The business’s new offerings promise clients end-to-end procurement, helping them acquire the perfect solutions at a good price. In fact, Sales Director Andrew Do claims that the company works on a “Deal or No Deal” basis. 

The process starts with a free IT review of the client’s business. “We assess your procurement practices and policies to see if we could help you make savings. If we can’t offer you a reduction in technology costs, we walk away,” explains Mr. Do.

He goes on to elaborate that, whilst Ava Tech promises optimised IT spending, it does not always mean the lowest price. However, he does promise the best price for the right solution.

Therefore, if the client already has a cost-efficient procurement strategy and the company cannot offer a better deal, it won’t use pushy sales tactics to try and convince them.

This claim is backed by hard numbers. The company is currently boasting an average of 22% savings across their client base.

Whilst IT procurement is a service designed to provide the complete hardware and software infrastructure of a business, IT hardware procurement focuses on the tangible assets that an organisation might need.

In either case, the IT products are delivered anywhere in the world. The company also promises flexibility in terms of customising IT deliverables for various departments in the client’s organisation.

With a decade of experience under its belt, Ava Tech has built a network of distributors and suppliers. The business partners with big names like Google, Microsoft, Lenovo, Samsung, HP, Sophos, Cisco, Meraki, LG, Apple, Logitech, Dell, and CAE Technology (the only Cisco-approved shared support specialist).

In terms of hardware procurement, the company not only supplies computers and laptops, but also networks, cabling, and conferencing & telephony. 

Ava Tech also specialises in audio-visual meeting room design. That includes all-in-one conference solutions, single private soundproof booths, huddle rooms, and conferencing or auditorium/all-hands areas.

In addition, clients can get a complete range of software solutions depending on their requirements. The company started out hosting desktops and Microsoft 365, but has extended its portfolio to include almost any software application that its clients might require.

Ava Tech is a London-based company that provides IT solutions to businesses. It provides a perfect balance of personalised, Agile service backed by a vast network of suppliers and partners across the world. To learn more about the company, please visit https://www.ava-tech.co.uk/ 

Categories
Health & Medicine Science Technology U.K U.S

FDA Releases Draft Guidance for Decentralised Clinical Trials; Adoption of DCT is Expected to Increase

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reportedly released a draft guidance detailing its recommendations on performing decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) for drugs, biological products and medical devices.

With the draft, FDA is committed to providing trial sponsors, researchers, and other stakeholders with guidance on how to accelerate DCT adoption to facilitate drug development, reported European Pharmaceutical Review.

FDA’s New Draft Guidance

The newly issued draft guidance is developed on the recommendations the agency detailed in 2020. With the earlier guidance, FDA aimed to help study teams facilitate trial decentralisation in response to the disruptions (e.g. travel restrictions, site closure, quarantines) and public health emergencies caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“The FDA has long considered the benefits of decentralised clinical trials. Advancements in digital health technologies and the COVID-19 pandemic – when in-person visits were limited or unavailable for many trial participants – have accelerated the broader adoption of these activities,” explained FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf.

This new draft offers recommendations related to the FDA’s conditions for investigations of medicinal products when applied to decentralised studies and meets the requirement outlined in section 3606(a)(1), FDA Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA).

FDA released the guidance a few months after the EU regulators demonstrated their recommendations on DCT to help protect the rights and well-being of the trial participants.

In the draft guidance, FDA provides stakeholders with recommendations on DCT design, conducting remote clinical trial visits and clinical trial-related activities, the adoption of digital health technologies (DHT) as enablers of clinical research, the responsibilities of the involved stakeholders, and how investigational medicine should be administered.

Breaking Down the Recommendations

Providing a framework for DCT design, FDA stresses the importance of having a physical location while conducting DCTs to ensure easy access to participant records and investigators’ care.

The trial protocol should clearly define when a tele-health checkup is required and when a patient needs an in-person visit.

FDA urges investigators to confirm participant identity during each remote visit.

According to the agency, the protocols for using DHTs in a virtual trial to gather data for trial endpoints should be compatible with the draft guidance “Digital Health Technologies for Remote Data Acquisition in Clinical Investigation”.

Additionally, in the newly released draft guidance, the FDA has urged sponsors to strive for enhancing participant diversity and inclusiveness in clinical trials. 

FDA stresses the importance of engaging local healthcare providers (HCPs” in trial activities to build trust with at-risk participants, thus improving the inclusion of diverse populations. 

While DCTs and hybrid models can encourage a much higher enrollment rate, FDA suggests investigators recruit only as many participants as they can efficiently manage to provide enough supervision of trial-related activities. 

According to the agency, while taking remote consent from the trial participants, they should be informed about whom to contact in case they face any health issues during the trial period and who can access their personal health information (PHI) acquired during the DCT.

FDA underscores leveraging central IRB in decentralised trials as a key to facilitating the review of the protocol, the informed consent documents, and other pertinent trial data.

In addition, investigational products (IP) should be administered to the participants only under the in-person supervision of the investigator or the supervision of a sub-investigator answerable to the investigator.

It’s recommended for sponsors to take into account the type of an investigational device, its prospective application, and the associated risks to determine its use cases efficiently.

IPs can be directly delivered to the participants’ location and the trial protocol should clearly define the methods of preserving the integrity and stability of the IP.

FDA recommends the use of a centralised distribution system to facilitate the delivery of IP to trial participants.

The sponsor is responsible for thoroughly monitoring the DCT processes while ensuring the trial is being conducted per the general investigational protocols and considerations included in the IND or IDE applications. 

The implemented safety monitoring plan in a trial should be devised considering the decentralised nature of the investigation. It should ensure any adverse events are detected early, correctly captured, and efficiently addressed.

FDA suggests sponsors implement high-end DCT software that can help manage electronic case report forms (eCRFs) and electronic informed consent (eConsent), schedule trial activities, sync data input in DHTs, and more. 

High-end DCT platforms such as ObvioHealth can efficiently address the issues of data inaccuracy and the interoperability essential to produce robust trial outcomes and endpoints.

Wrapping Up

Decentralised and hybrid study models are considered the way forward to decrease the patient burden. Offering participants the support and flexibility they need, DCTs also help improve data quality. 

The result: augmented trial result and accelerated drug development

“As we seek to improve our evidence generation system, decentralised clinical trials may enhance convenience for trial participants, reduce the burden on caregivers, expand access to more diverse populations, improve trial efficiencies, and facilitate research on rare diseases and diseases affecting populations with limited mobility,” commented FDA Commissioner.

Categories
Computers & Software Technology U.K U.S

Leading IT Service and Consulting Company Atos Launched Eviden Brand Ahead of the Planned €5 billion Carve-out

Ahead of the pre-planned €5 billion carve-out, Atos has reportedly unveiled its Eviden brand.

In June 2022, Atos – the leading French multinational IT service and consulting company – announced to curate strategies to split itself down the middle.

As planned, the company has cleaved itself in two, with its burgeoning digital, big data, and security (BDS) lines to operate as Eviden, according to Consultancy Europe.

The other half, which comprises the business’s tech foundations business line, will continue under the Atos name. To differentiate this carved-out, future entity from the current Atos business, the company is addressing it as TFCo for now. 

Breaking Down the Carve-out

The split-up, costing around €1.5 billion, is planned to be “effective at the earliest on July 1, 2023, and at the latest on December 31, 2023”. The brand of the spin-off business was launched in April this year.

The new business, initially slated to be launched as Evidian, later spun out from Atosunder the name “Eviden,” retaining the same etymology (“evidence”).

The post-carve-out Atos business is planned to constitute the Digital Workplace, Data Centre and Hosting, Unified Communications, and Business Process Outsourcing units of Atos. 

Operating within the Atos business and trading as “Eviden, an Atos business,” the spin-off company also includes the Atos Consulting business.

Eviden – which comprises the shrinking units of the parent company – would have a headcount of roughly 48000 globally and revenues of around €5.4B.

Atos has confirmed to invest €1.1 billion during the 2022-2026 period as part of its effort to support a return on investment (ROI).

Fleshing Out the Reasons Behind the Split-up

After conducting a “preliminary strategic review,” Atos, one of the world’s leading IT businesses with revenues of €11 billion – decided to split itself into two separate entities in order to “unlock more value” for the stakeholders. 

However, tough economic headwinds facing the company have been marked as the key reason behind the spin-off. 

Even though the IT business is expanding at a breakneck pace globally, last year, Atos saw a sharp decline of 3% in its revenue. Earlier this year, the technology consulting giant issued its third profit warning due to the significant difference in the financial KPIs, causing the company’s shares to plunge to their lowest since mid-2022. 

The strategy Atos adopted to cleave itself in two businesses is similar to how IBM spun out its $19B managed infrastructure services into Kyndryl in November 2021.

According to its hot-off-the-presses site, Eviden is committed to turning out as a global leader in “data-driven, trusted and sustainable digital transformation,” bringing together the digital, cloud, and big data & security business lines of the parent company Atos.

Billing itself as “one of the largest carve-outs the industry has ever seen,” Eviden demonstrates its vision to “expand the possibilities of data and technology”.

That said, being a highly intricate and cross-functional process, a carve-out transaction needs to be executed carefully and by experts.

For any dynamic business looking to maximise its transaction value, investing in an expert carve-out consulting service like Fission Consulting is a logical investment.

A high-end service helps streamline the slew of complex and lengthy processes to speed up the overall separation timeline while ensuring data accuracy.

Wrapping Up

Nikki Kelly, former Senior Vice President for Public Sector and Defence in Northern Europe at Atos has been elected as the CEO of Northern Europe & APAC for Eviden, an Atos company.

“I’m excited to start my new role with Eviden as the CEO for Northern Europe & Asia Pacific,” stated the newly appointed CEO. “A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to help scale a €5 billion new company with deep industry expertise, innovation in our DNA, helping our clients to be competitive and deliver secure, digital business solutions quickly at scale.”

Categories
Computers & Software Health & Medicine Pharmaceuticals & Biotech Science U.K

The Biggest Compliance Issues Faced by MedTech Companies Transitioning to Data-Enabled Solutions

In April, the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHPRA) released a guidance document, called Software and Artificial Intelligence as a Medical Device. This document is a compilation of previous guidance, advice, and regulatory requirements for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and Artificial Intelligence as a Medical Device (AIaMD).

The document covers:

  • How software as a general medical device or an IVD should be classified
  • What the UK regulatory framework is for SaMDs
  • A change programme roadmap for software and AI as a medical device
  • How to qualify and classify one’s SaMD, including how to create an intended use statement
  • Reporting adverse events once the SaMD is in use, and requirements for field safety corrective actions
  • The guiding principles to inform the development of Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) for artificial intelligence

This document has been developed keeping in mind the goal of advancing software and AI medical device regulation. With these technologies becoming a growing part of the MedTech industry, this seems like a reasonable next step.

Data-Enabled Solutions in MedTech

Whilst software and AI as a medical device is a growing market which is now at the forefront due to the rapid rise in the use of AI, it’s not a completely new idea.

Technology has been in use in medicine and medical research for a while now. However, as computing grows more sophisticated, so do the devices.

In fact, across the pond, there is a growing concern about regulatory compliance issues surrounding MedTech. 

Earlier this year, an article in Med City News talked about the top five compliance issues faced by MedTech companies transitioning to data-enabled solutions.

Here they are.

Compliance Issues That MedTech Companies Face

Managing How the Data Is Collected, Used, and Shared

Smart MedTech solutions rely on data gathered from the people who use them. That is why the first issue to consider is related to data gathering and storage.

Companies that use MedTech-enabled data platforms are obligated to take appropriate care of any information collected, including,

  • Patient data
  • Drug development data
  • Customer or provider data
  • AI/ML-developed data sets

Any data collected, used, or shared must be prioritised with the following in mind:

  • Legal mandates
  • GDPR
  • HIPAA
  • Others
  • Ethical values
  • Patient rights and dignity
  • Patient care and care quality
  • Minimising patient risk and burden
  • Data access

Keeping the Changing Interactions Between Patients, Physicians, and Other Stakeholders in Mind

Medical care is shifting from treatment to preventative treatment, which has led to a change in how patients interact with healthcare providers.

This means that not only is the relationship between them changing, but there’s also an increase in the use of technology for patient monitoring and real-time data entry.

This data collection would require greater collaboration with stakeholders, which is something to consider when planning compliant protocols.

Planning New Regulation Regimes for Donation of EHR, Cybersecurity Technology, and Information Blocking

Electronic Health Records (EHR) are replacing the old paper documentation. These EHRs can be shared between health systems and providers for the sake of interoperability. 

However, those donations need to be adequately tracked.

There needs to be a system in place to ensure there is a legitimate need for the adoption and topics such as updates and replacements have been addressed

Additionally, the provider of this information must not engage in “information blocking”, which has been defined as any activity that impedes the exchange or use of the health information.

Addressing Value-Based Care Considerations and the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute Safe Harbours

Data-enabled MedTech has the potential to make patient care much more empathetic, streamlined, and comprehensive. However, these qualities rely on better design and regulations.

At the same time, MedTech companies also need to ensure that their practices align with the regulatory requirements of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbours.

Balancing the Lack of Advanced Industry Standards Against a Rapidly Growing Technology

MedTech and communication technologies have exploded in the last couple of decades. And, the rise of AI has been even more dramatic. As such, the existing rules and regulations need to evolve with these new developments.

Managing regulatory compliance, especially for an industry like MedTech, can be quite challenging. That is where companies like RegASK can help. Such a service can help one not only maintain compliance but also keep up with any changes.

As is evident from the rise of tools like ChatGPT, the world is going to see more automation through AI. The important thing is to design compliance regulations that are as effective and as scalable as that technology.